In the 2026 period, medical device import is planned by looking at the annex of the communiqué family's medical device leg: if the GTİP sits in the control list, a TAREKS application before the declaration is mandatory. The application's core is the evidence set showing the device's conformity to the medical device legislation: CE marking and declaration of conformity, the notified body certificate where applicable, ÜTS registration and labelling information. The assessment opens in three directions: with no-control-needed the customs flow continues; with a document review the file is assessed technically; with a physical inspection the product, its labelling and marking are verified. The critical link is ÜTS: an unregistered device jams in the import flow however strong the document set. Planning therefore starts with ÜTS registration, continues with the TAREKS application and closes with the declaration; the three do not substitute for one another.
Medical device import sits in Türkiye at the intersection of two regulatory layers: the medical device legislation governing the product's placing on the market, and the foreign-trade controls inspecting the import. The instrument mapping this intersection annually is the medical device leg of the product safety and inspection communiqué family; for the 2026 period that role belongs to the medical device import inspection communiqué within the 2026-numbered family. The communiqué's annex lists which GTİP codes fall under control; before the declaration a conformity application is filed through TAREKS; the assessment runs over the device's CE marking, registration status and labelling integrity. This article explains the communiqué's scope, the TAREKS document set, the way ÜTS registration ties into the customs flow, and nonconformity scenarios. A practical frame is offered for distributors, manufacturer representatives, clinical research teams and customs operations.
Who is this for?
This guide is for every party importing, or planning to import, medical devices or IVD products into Türkiye. Manufacturer representatives and distributors are the group managing the communiqué scope and the ÜTS infrastructure most frequently. Hospital and laboratory procurement units look at this frame when questioning a supplier's import competence. Clinical research teams must know the rules that differentiate device imports for investigation. Customs brokers and logistics providers build the document chain before the declaration. Quality and regulatory units keep the product portfolio current at each annual communiqué renewal. E-commerce operations and healthcare institutions buying directly are also in scope: even where the end use is healthcare delivery, the import follows the commercial transaction rule. In an audit the question runs one way: through which permit and registration chain did this device enter the country.
Which products does it cover?
The scope is drawn by the GTİP list in the communiqué annex and approaches the entirety of products falling under the medical device definition: devices for diagnosis, treatment and monitoring, surgical instruments, electromedical equipment, imaging systems, IVD analysers and kits, dental products, active implantable devices, and their accessories and components. A device's software component passes through the same chain as part of the device. Borderline products, whether device or not, are in practice the subject of this article: wellness applications, general-purpose measuring devices and cosmetic devices sit at the definition's edge and should not be imported before the qualification decision is filed. On the GTİP side, the device family is gathered mainly under the mechanical and electromechanical medical instruments position; but each product is classified by its own composition and function. The communiqué annexes change annually; deciding from the previous year's list is the primary source of scope error.
When does it apply?
The communiqué control applies to every free circulation entry of products in scope, before the declaration. Some situations concentrate the risk. On first import the product has no ÜTS history, and the registration process moves ahead of the import calendar. When the device undergoes a model or version change, the ÜTS registration and conformity documents must be renewed; shipping a new product on an old record produces a mismatch. A change in the notified body certificate's scope or validity requires the evidence set's update. A manufacturing site change makes the CE certificate a matter of re-assessment. A change of authorised representative triggers rebuilding the registration chain from the start. Shipment of the same device under different GTİP codes requires the scope reading for every declaration. Used or refurbished equipment imports are a separate assessment subject and in most cases conflict with the placing-on-market rules. Temporary imports, for fairs, service or demos, must be clarified in status separately.
Legal framework and authority
The frame has three layers. The first is the medical device legislation: Türkiye applies the European Union device regulations nationally; the product's placing on the market, CE marking, notified body processes and registration obligations are set in that frame. The second is the registration and traceability system: ÜTS runs the device's national registration and traceability; registration operates as a precondition of placing on the market and of import. The third is the foreign-trade control: the annual product safety and inspection communiqués determine which products are inspected by which mechanism at import; for the 2026 period the relevant numbered communiqué of that family governs medical devices. The competent authorities are TİTCK and the Ministry of Trade: TİTCK manages the device legislation and the registration system, while the customs-side control runs through the Ministry's system. The communiqué text and annexes are published in the Official Gazette; announcements are tracked from the ministry's product safety unit. The current numbering can change every year; the current text must govern before every application.
Step-by-step process
- Clarify the product's device definition and classification: which rule, which class, which conformity assessment route.
- Confirm the GTİP from your classification file and check the scope against the current year's communiqué annex.
- Verify the ÜTS registration: is the product registered model and version by version, is the record consistent with the importer information.
- Collect the evidence set: CE declaration of conformity, notified body certificate, label and instructions for use samples, Turkish-language information requirements.
- Bind the authorised representative and importer roles in writing; add the responsibility matrix to the file.
- Create the TAREKS conformity application before the declaration, upload the documents and await the risk outcome.
- Complete the customs flow on a no-control-needed outcome; if control is selected, prepare for the technical assessment.
- Keep a file ready that can present the product-label-registration match quickly in a document review or physical inspection.
- Archive the records after the shipment and update the scope table at the annual communiqué renewal.
Document checklist
- Device definition, classification rationale and the conformity assessment route applied.
- CE marking information and the signed declaration of conformity, matching the product version.
- Notified body certificate, its scope and validity verified.
- ÜTS registration output, with model and version matching.
- Authorised representative designation and importer details.
- Label and instructions for use samples, with the mandatory Turkish-language information.
- GTİP classification note and the current communiqué annex page.
- Purchase documents: proforma, invoice, consistency of the product description with the file.
- TAREKS application and outcome records.
- Shipment file: declaration, control outcome, receipt records.
Parties and responsibilities
| Party | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Importer | Accuracy of the declaration and document set; operability of the registration chain |
| Manufacturer / Authorised representative | CE evidence, technical file access and currency of the registration |
| Distributor | Accuracy of ÜTS information, label control and stock management |
| Customs broker | Tying the TAREKS outcome to the declaration, annex list check |
| TİTCK | Device legislation, registration system and market surveillance |
| Ministry of Trade | Import inspection mechanism and application of the communiqués |
| Quality / regulatory unit | Annual scope renewal, change management and archive |
The matrix binds the two ends of the registration chain together: the manufacturer's technical evidence and the importer's commercial declaration. Whichever end breaks, the result is the same: waiting at customs and nonconformity risk.
Exceptions and edge cases
The edges of communiqué practice need care. Bringing devices for research purposes does not count as placing on the market and is the subject of the clinical investigation legislation; but at customs the inspection route is still asked and the status must be shown with documents. Personal-use and passenger accompanying goods limits are assessed for consignments without commercial character; the boundary is quantity and genuine intended use. Equipment arriving temporarily for service and maintenance is assessed under temporary status rules and carries an exit obligation. At the device-software boundary, whether the software is offered with the device or independently changes the registration and declaration chain. In IVD products, the difference between diagnostic use and research use changes the status. A device's non-medical general-use equivalent is the subject of different legislation; the claim and intended use are decisive. For products entering the annexes of more than one communiqué, the most comprehensive assessment governs. Even for a product that appears out of scope, a screening record should be kept.
Common mistakes
The most common mistake is planning the shipment without ÜTS registration; the product waits at the port for the record. The second is taking the declaration of conformity from an outdated version; the product version and the document mismatch. The third is not verifying the notified body certificate's scope; the certificate exists but the product is outside its scope. The fourth is neglecting the mandatory Turkish-language information on the label; in a physical inspection it is direct nonconformity. The fifth is looking at last year's communiqué annex; the scope list has changed. The sixth is processing an investigation device like a commercial import; the status error requires retrospective correction. The seventh is not reflecting a distributor change into ÜTS; the registration chain breaks.
Important notice
This article is general information, not legal or customs advice; for a specific device's scope, registration and permit status, TİTCK legislation and the current communiqué texts must govern and a licensed customs broker consulted. GTİP codes and communiqué numbers mentioned here are illustrative; the GTİP examples are not binding, and the numbering can change annually. Official sources must be checked before any transaction.
Frequently asked questions
Is the 2026/16 number fixed, or does it change every year?
As the communiqué family is republished every year, the numbering is renewed too; for the 2026 period the relevant communiqué of the medical device import inspection family applies. The number must be tracked year by year and the current number referenced in applications. More important than the number itself is the current state of the product list in its annex and of the documents required. The Official Gazette publication and the ministry's announcements are the primary source of the current numbering.
Is import possible without ÜTS registration?
For devices in scope, in practice no. Registration is one of the preconditions of the import flow and is asked in the document assessment. Since the registration process takes time depending on product information, classification and the representative structure, it must be placed at the start of the import calendar. For research-purpose imports the registration requirement can differ; but that difference depends on the status being documented and is not automatic. An unregistered product, at best, waits at customs.
Is the device's CE marking sufficient?
Necessary but not sufficient on its own. The CE mark is the visible sign that the device passed its conformity assessment; but import inspection is assessed not by the mark but by the evidence beneath it: the declaration of conformity, the certificate's scope, technical file accessibility and registration status. Moreover, CE removes neither the national registration nor the Turkish-language information obligations. Deformities in the mark itself are also grounds for nonconformity in a physical inspection. In short: CE is a mandatory entry ticket, not the whole of it.
What happens if the control ends in nonconformity?
The goods' entry into free circulation is halted and a decision minute is drawn. If the nonconformity is document-based, for instance missing Turkish-language information, the correction route can be negotiated; if it is product-based, for instance a violation of safety parameters, re-export or destruction comes onto the agenda. The decision can be appealed within the defined period; an appeal is a defence with basis and evidence. The process is treated in detail in the nonconformity article; the critical point here is this: do not act before taking the minute, and assess the options in parallel without missing the period.
Official sources
- TİTCK Medical Device Clinical ResearchTİTCK / Ticaret Bakanlığı · verified 07 Sep 2026
- Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745, EUR-LexTİTCK / Ticaret Bakanlığı · verified 07 Sep 2026
- Product Safety and Inspection Communiqué AnnouncementsTİTCK / Ticaret Bakanlığı · verified 07 Sep 2026
Revision history
v1.1 · 07 Sep 2026 — Content import: external full text applied.
v1.0 · 13 Aug 2026 — Initial source-backed publication.